Monday, March 26, 2012

How Rob Ford failed Etobicoke North

 
How Rob Ford failed Etobicoke North
Published on blogTO | shared via feedly

Rob Ford Etobicoke NorthThe mayor of Toronto has often expressed that he has been given a mandate by voters to build subways. You only require a critical examination, though, of his ten year history of supporting (or not supporting) transit initiatives in his former riding of Ward 2 (Etobicoke North) and by default Wards 1 & 3 (due to its geographical importance to the citizens of Ward 2 to have two different potential LRT options to access easily) to properly understand just what mandate and authority the mayor has when it comes to speaking to matters involving transit in the city of Toronto.

Ward 2 has been under the control of the Fords for twelve years. A statistical examination of Ward 2 data will tell you two things - this is an area of a lower household income in comparison to the rest of the city of Toronto, and this is also a riding that relies upon the car a lot more than the rest of the city (so for a lot of working-class families, the dollar is being stretched significantly without viable transit options provided).

If you examine a map of Toronto, residents of Ward 1 & 2 have to travel an average of 15-20 kilometres via surface bus routes to find their way to a connecting subway line (Be it a Wilson, Kipling, or Finch Station) If you live in Ward 1 or 2, it's going to take you a long while to get anywhere by transit (which may be one of the reasons why individuals rely upon the car so much more). That, and the absolutely atrocious service in this area necessitate alternate forms of transportation beyond a very slow and congested bus.

You need only ride either the 96 Wilson or 36 Finch West buses to understand the challenges riders in this area face. At any peak time of service during the day, it can sometimes take up to 50-60 minutes (on average) for the rider to find their way to Wilson or Finch Station (These results are the average amount over a ten day period at various peak intervals where I have taken the bus myself) These are facts you do not get from a mayor riding the bus once during an off-peak time as a publicity stunt barking 'subways!'

This is the daily challenge riders in his previous ward face on a day to day basis - a challenge which has not been addressed in a clear, concise manner by the Mayor or his councillor brother, but was addressed by the original Transit City plan. These are the constituents upon whose backs he's stepped upon to become mayor, and not once have these specific concerns been addressed, since he took his oath of leadership to lead this city.

One need only look at the cancellation of Transit city (specifically with regard to the Finch and Eglinton LRT) to understand where the priorities of the Mayor lie when it comes to serving those who elected him to office for ten years (and subsequently were responsible for his increased profile to be able to run for Mayor). Here, for the first time, options of LRT were presented that would have alleviated a majority of the concerns of ridership in this area.

A realist would understand that in the present financial climate, there is no money that would suddenly produce subways extending along Finch or Eglinton in our lifetime, so this was the first viable, affordable option to be presented to people who elected him to serve their interests. This was a way to help the working-class taxpayers of his riding save money, get to work or school in a far more timely fashion, and bring our part of the city closer to the core.

Having been a resident of Ward 2 for a majority of my 38 years, this was the first time I could recall positive dialogue and support to connect this chronically neglected area to the rest of this city. You need only drive through Etobicoke North to understand that there is plenty of space and opportunity for LRT that would not negatively impact upon users of automobiles. Further, if we use the argument by the mayor that a Sheppard subway line would attract business and eventually pay for itself, the same logic could be applied to above-ground LRT benefiting an area that has not seen any significant development in decades (What was the last initiative or major project you remember being built in Etobicoke North?)

Filling in a pothole or barking continuously about private garbage collection doesn't mean you've properly looked after the people who are responsible for your higher profile that allowed you to run for Mayor in the first place.

The Mayor had the opportunity to truly serve his former constituents when he took his oath, and he failed. In all his talk about 'subways!' neither he nor his brother have mentioned what they will do in matters of transit, for the riding that has brought them to power, in the immediate future. You can't simply say one word, have no tangible plan or basis of funds to serve this fantasy, and expect our continual support.

No matter how hypnotized constituents of this riding are by his 'common man,' approach, and no matter how much the Fords believe they have absolute support in this riding, they do not live here. I do. I have neighbours, and we talk, and their tone and dialogue is beginning to shift towards questioning what exactly is happening in their riding.

We are long term residents of this area, and we see the neglect and lack of investment in the people of this Ward, and eventually even the most hypnotized of individuals begin to question just what kind of mandate anyone has to represent them when they've been crushed under the wheel when it comes to issues like transit, on a continual basis.

Coaching football at Don Bosco or handing out business cards doesn't make you relevant
in this area. Dismissing tangible, viable plans that help your citizens, is not being a leader, and certainly not the reason why you were elected by anyone in the first place.

The simple fact is, if you have an individual who votes against the transit initiatives to serve his constituents directly, and who fights against transit expansion that would serve his former Ward, how qualified is he truly to speak to any kind of issue when it comes to transit? Where is the authority that he possesses?

The Fords need to be very careful. If there were ever a critical examination of their records beyond this issue of transit in this area, you would arguably find a parallel neglect and lack of understanding and support for those who helped assist in his attaining power.

Unfortunately, people tend to ignore Etobicoke North. Clearly, when I hear the mayor speak now about fighting funding for LRTs and having no new transit options rather than going with the legal authority of council, I clearly can see that the Mayor, and his brother, are quite intent upon ignoring Etobicoke North as well.

This post has been contributed by Rahim Ladha who is a long-time resident of Ward 2. Photo by Oliver Plante in the blogTO Flickr pool


Saturday, March 24, 2012

Everything You Need to Go All Out for the Mad Men Premiere

 
Everything You Need to Go All Out for the Mad Men Premiere
Published on Gizmodo | shared via feedly
Mad Men Season 5 premieres this Sunday. The show's been gone for basically two years, but its popularity hasn't gone anywhere. Here's everything you'll need to nerd out on your favorite advertising renegades hard enough to make everyone else at your viewing party feel uncomfortable. More »



9 places to get Filipino-style lechon in Toronto

 
9 places to get Filipino-style lechon in Toronto
Published on blogTO | shared via feedly

Lechon TorontoAt a Filipino party, there is always one centre of attention - and its not the loud line-dancing auntie, the creepy uncle hogging the karaoke, or the wealthy doctor's snooty beauty queen daughter. No, the real star of any real Filipino fiesta is the roast pig - the lechon. But what if you don't have a party to crash this week and have a hankering to dig on some swine, Filipino-style?

Lechon originated in Spain and variants of it exist in many former Spanish colonies, the Philippines being one. And just because the Philippines is in Asia and early Chinese immigrants molded a lot of the country's history, don't be confusing Filipino-style lechon with that Chinese siu yuk roast pork hanging in the window at Spadina and Dundas. It's like comparing apples (in a pig's mouth) and oranges.

In fact, I'm sorry Spanish, Chinese and Portuguese people: Filipino-style lechon is the world's number one roast pig - just ask chef, author and TV personality Anthony Bourdain, or any of the purveyors of fine Filipino pork products listed below.

Here is a list of places in Toronto to get Filipino style Lechon.

Bernard's Pilipino Specialties (1534 Queen Street West)
Operating in Parkdale since the 1980s, Bernard is the elder statesman for Toronto lechon-aires. Not only is he from Iloilo (this area of the Philippines is known for the best lechon), Bernard is also 80 years young, so rest assured - you are getting both authenticity and years of porcine craftsmanship with every bite. This, my kaibigan (my friend!) is the REAL THING. Respect.

Taste Good BBQ (4186-4188 Finch Ave East)
The sign outside says 'Filipino-style lechon' but once you get inside to eat, you realize this is Chinese-style BBQ pork. The differences between Chinese-style and Filipino-style roast pork are actually subtle enough to fool a novice's palate, but in this case those details are inconsequential. Simply put, the roast pork at Taste Good... didn't.

Bella's Lechon (1139 Morningside Avenue, Scarborough)
The trademark of Filipino-style lechon is the smooth red-coloured skin, crackling and shiny like a candy apple coating. It's not uncommon to arrive late to the party to find that early birds have left the lechon totally stripped naked of this rare treat. The pork skin is the stamp of authenticity in Filipino-style lechon and Bella's gets it just right.

Mike's BBQ (4400 Sheppard Avenue, Scarborough)
Mike's is a Chinese BBQ place, which means you can get BBQ chicken, duck and Chinese BBQ pork. So where's the lechon? Like many Chinese barbecuers, they offer Filipino-style pork too! But not so fast -- the skin isn't the aforementioned smooth and shiny kind. It's puffed and bumpy - Chinese style. WAIT, don't walk out -- take a bite and you'll taste traces of lemon grass and garlic, which are trademarks of the Filipino way of making lechon. Think of Mike's as a hybrid, which is sort of like Filipino culture anyway if you think about it.

Sun BBQ Co (296 Browns Line)
Sun is another Chinese pig roaster, so when ordering make sure that you specify Filipino-style. Forget to do so and it will be a different experience, right down to the spice and the sauce. The Chinese variant of roast pig is seasoned with five-spice, white pepper and salt and and is usually served with hoisin sauce. Ask and ye shall receive -- Sun can give you the Filipino-style roast complete pig with Filipino-style lechon sauce made of breadcrumbs, black pepper, onion, vinegar, ground pork liver and sugar. That's right, all the good stuff.

Son Lechon BBQ Restaurant (3366 Keele Street)
Not to be confused with the west-end competitor of almost the same name, Son Lechon has actually been roasting up lechons in Toronto for a number of years, so they have the Filipino-style down-pat. Filipino-style pig-roasting incorporates the use of lemongrass, garlic and bay leaf - the best things available in a typical rural Philippine setting. Only thing missing? My Uncle Boy squatting over smoky coals, painstakingly hand-rotating the pig on a spit while smoking a Marlboro with the other hand.

Kanto by Tita Flips (Dundas and Bathurst, northeast side)
In the Philippines, eating more daily meals in smaller portions on-the-go is a big reason that street food is a cultural staple in the archipelago's more urban locales. One thing is clear - Filipino street food is a genre that needs to be taken to the next level here in the Tdot. We're glad to hear that Tita Flips has set up Kanto at the corner of Dundas and Bathurst to offer, among other tasty things, a single-serve Lechon Kawali (Crispy Pork Belly) that is getting streetwise rave reviews for its juicy-ness and outer crisp.

Dynasty BBQ (1550 South Gateway Road, Mississauga)
Could it be? Filipino lechon west of the 427? Not quite - but if you ask the Chinese cooks at Dynasty BBQ in the Dixie Park Mall to roast a pig for you Filipino-style, they'll do it and get it mostly right. The skin isn't quite Cebu-style but the accompanying lechon sauce tastes authentic -- so does the tenderness of the meat. That's surprising since Filipino-style lechon is typically cooked differently - "slow and low" for a more fall-off-the-bone experience. Pay at the register and drive around the back where someone will help you load The Lord of the Flies into the cargo area of your Chevy Astro minivan.

Lamesa (669 Queen St. W.)
The Filipino restaurant rumoured to open in the location that The Rosebud once occupied hasn't yet gone public -- but the buzz on the street is deafening. Insiders have tipped us off about a possible Pork Belly Adobo -- which (if it truly does exist) is what would happen if Lechon Kawali got married to Adobo, the Philippines beloved national dish. If that's not enough, I thought I heard someone mention chicharon (deep fried pork rind) as the garnish on top of it all (keep your damn cherry!). Fusion and creative plating? Could the Filipino cuisine beautification project be finally underway? I won't say I told you so.

See also:

The best Filipino restaurants in Toronto

Writing by Leonard Cervantes. Photo from Kanto.ca


Sunday, March 11, 2012

‘Legend Of The Seeker’ Craig Horner Lands Title Role In CW’s ‘Joey Dakota’

 
‘Legend Of The Seeker’ Craig Horner Lands Title Role In CW’s ‘Joey Dakota’
Published on ScienceFiction.com | shared via feedly

About the same time the CW network announced that they had green-lit the pilot for ‘The Selection’, they also announced they would be making an American version of the Isreali show ‘Danny Hollywood’ called ‘Joey Dakota’. While it seems like the casting for ‘The Selection’ has been coming along, we’re finally getting some news about [...]


Read original article at: ‘Legend Of The Seeker’ Craig Horner Lands Title Role In CW’s ‘Joey Dakota’

Science Fiction


Wednesday, March 7, 2012

BBC News - Google implements privacy policy despite EU warning

Google implements privacy policy despite EU warning

People sit on a sofa in front of a Google logo The new privacy policy is rolling out around the world on 1 March

Related Stories

Internet company Google has gone ahead with its new privacy policy despite warnings from the EU that it might violate European law.

The change means private data collected by one Google service can be shared with its other platforms including YouTube, Gmail and Blogger.

Google said the new set up will enable it to tailor search results better.

But data regulators in France have cast doubt on the legality of move and have launched a Europe-wide investigation.

Google has merged 60 guidelines for its individual sites into a single policy for all of its services.

France's privacy watchdog CNIL wrote to Google earlier this week, urging for a "pause" in rolling out the revised policy.

"The CNIL and EU data authorities are deeply concerned about the combination of personal data across services," the regulator wrote.

"They have strong doubts about the lawfulness and fairness of such processing, and its compliance with European data protection legislation."

The regulator said it would send Google questions on the changes by mid-March.

'Strong as ever'

In response, Google's global privacy counsel Peter Fleischer said he was happy to answer any concerns CNIL had.

"As we've said several times over the past week, while our privacy policies will change on 1st March, our commitment to our privacy principles is as strong as ever," Mr Fleischer wrote in a blog post.

Start Quote

Google is putting advertisers' interests before user privacy”

End Quote Nick Pickles Big Brother Watch

The company rejected the regulator's request to hold off on making the changes. Users are being moved onto the new single policy shortly after midnight on 1 March, local time.

Google's business model - the selling of ads targeted around individual user behaviour - relies on collecting browsing information from its visitors.

Until today, this information was kept apart between services.

This meant a search on, for example, YouTube, would have no significance on what results or advertising you would encounter on another Google site like Gmail.

The new agreement, which users cannot opt out of unless they stop using Google's services, will mean activity on all of the company's sites will be linked.

Many websites and blogs in the technology community have given guidance for users concerned about how their browsing history will be used.

They suggest users can access, and delete, their browsing and search history on the site by logging in to google.com/history.

A similar page for YouTube viewing and search history can also be accessed.

Users can see which of Google services hold data about them by viewing their dashboard.

'Advertiser interests'

In preparation for the policy change, Google displayed prominent messages notifying visitors about the plans. A dedicated section was set up to provide more details.

Google service logos Google argued that combining the policies will make it simpler for users

However, campaign group Big Brother Watch has argued that not enough has been done to ensure people are fully aware of the alterations.

A poll of over 2,000 people conducted by the group in conjunction with YouGov suggested 47% of Google users in the UK were not aware policy changes were taking place.

Only 12% of British Google users, Big Brother Watch said, had read the new agreement.

The group's director Nick Pickles said: "If people don't understand what is happening to their personal information, how can they make an informed choice about using a service?

"Google is putting advertisers' interests before user privacy and should not be rushing ahead before the public understand what the changes will mean."

Courteney Cox and Josh Hopkins Talk COUGAR TOWN, “The Road to the Altar is Lined with Red Wine!”

 
Courteney Cox and Josh Hopkins Talk COUGAR TOWN, “The Road to the Altar is Lined with Red Wine!”
Published on the TV addict | shared via feedly


Friday, March 2, 2012

Two Heads Are Better Than One! Cherry Jones and BD Wong Discuss Their Pivotal Roles in AWAKE

 
Two Heads Are Better Than One! Cherry Jones and BD Wong Discuss Their Pivotal Roles in AWAKE
Published on the TV addict | shared via feedly


 
Just because someone may be imagining a world where their wife or son has not died, does that make the person mentally unfit?  In the new thought-provoking series AWAKE, Cherry Jones and BD Wong play the psychiatrists in each world (one real and one imaginary) that Detective Michael Britten lives.  They are the voice of reason as Det. Britten tries to sustain a simultaneous existence in two very different worlds.  Due to the impact such a revelation could have on his job, they are literally the only people who he can trust and rely upon to figure out what is real or not real – or how to keep both realities alive.  Taking a few minutes to talk with press in a recent conference call, Cherry and BD candidly shared what the characters are doing to help Det. Britten navigate his very complicated psyche.
 
What was it about this role that made you want to play another psychiatrist/psychologist?
BD: I didn’t really want to play another psychiatrist or psychologist, but I was looking for a change after being on SVU for 11 years, and I just liked the script, the AWAKE script, which was then called REM, so much that I kind of just jumped at the chance and I did it rather blind to the fact that the characters were in the same job, actually. I just really thought the script was great and I wanted to be on the show.
 
Cherry, what brought you to the role?
CHERRY: Well, I was contacted by Howard Gordon a while ago. I mean a long time ago, about this show. And he, like producers do and writers do, he just told me this very, very rough, rough sketch of the show. And I thought, “Well that sounds awfully intriguing.” And then I guess when they wrote the part they wrote it for a, like a 29-year-old blonde, very inexperienced, very enthusiastic psychiatrist. And at that point, you had Britten’s beautiful young wife, you had the tennis instructor for Britten’s son, who was a beautiful young woman, and then you had this young psychiatrist who was a beautiful young woman. And I think finally the producers said to Kyle, “We’ll give you one, we’ll give you two, but we ain’t going to give you three.” And so they upped the age of the psychiatrist and called me and, like BD, I read the script and I just thought it was really intriguing.  I had no idea how it could work or sustain itself, but wanted to come along for the ride. And again it’s like the thing with pilots, you never have a clue whether they’re going to get picked up or not. And we just we just didn’t know, except the quality of it sure looked good while we were making it.
 
Is this role feel a little bit like you’re doing a play?  Because in both worlds, it is just two actors sitting eye-to-eye and nothing else going on for your scenes?
BD: Oh wow.
CHERRY: Lovely question.
BD: I do feel that the style of this show affords me more of an opportunity, even though it’s on television, to access some of the fun and the depth of the work that you can possibly do on stage.  I don’t think it’s at all similar really. I always find television completely different from working on stage. But I do feel that there is a kind of depth to this particular show that is a new thing for me. And I would kind of compare that in some way to the writing and the execution of a good play. But it is still kind of different.
CHERRY:  I’m like BD. I can’t really say, it’s so different.  And of course our roles are rather just physically rather static. So it really is about my brain trying to figure out his brain. And that’s about as — I don’t know if micro is the right word, but in acting it doesn’t get much smaller than that in a way, because you’re just going from one brain to the next, and just trying to — we have very different techniques, the two doctors, which is fun to play, although I wish we could be in a court of law sometimes the way he goes about it, just trying to help Detective Britten. But I can’t even begin to say that it’s like a play. I mean, I guess it’s like if you string them all together then it’s like a play. If you string all 13 episodes and our scenes together, then it’s like a play.  Then it’s our play and Britten’s play.
BD: Really not like a play in that we never see each other face-to-face as characters.  We’re not really going head-to-head in that way, except the editor is making us go head-to-head. We are never even in the same room. So we don’t have the action of playing off of each other in that way that you do when you’re on stage. We definitely are robbed of that.
 
Cherry, how did you enjoy doing “24” and then coming into this show?
CHERRY: Well, I loved being the president of the United States. You get a lot of respect in airports, especially from the screeners. No, it was a great job. And things have gotten much more quiet for me now.  I’ve gone from president of the United States to a psychiatrist with seemingly only one client, so my responsibilities have become smaller. But it’s cool to just sit in a chair.  I don’t even think of it as acting. It’s something about when it’s that small, and so intimate, it becomes something else.  Of course it’s acting, but it’s a very different experience from anything I’ve had before.
 
And for you, BD?
BD: Well, who else is there, right? The thing that I would agree with is that definitely that its focus is taken off of your body entirely when you’re sitting on that chair and emphasis is put on your face and inside your brain more. So I know exactly what Cherry’s talking about when she says there’s a completely different feeling to the kind of acting that you’re doing. I don’t think there really is a name for it. It’s just not body acting at all. I mean it’s very rarely at all related to anything you’re doing physically. And so that causes a kind of uber-cerebralness to it, I think, it makes you really aware of the thoughts and the ideas that you’re talking about in a way. It’s almost like turning the lights out or something like that, and hearing a person’s voice and really being able to concentrate on what it is that they’re saying because you’re only looking at their face and listening to their voice and not processing their body language. So I totally agree with that.  I think that’s really an interesting aspect of the part. And on those very few times when I’ve actually stood up or been in a situation there have been a couple of situations in the course of the season in which I was not sitting in that chair, it was a little bit of an adjustment to make, “Oh wow, this person actually walks and talks and does behaves differently outside of that chair.”
CHERRY: And if I had anything to do over — I have a gorgeous chair in my office that I sit in, but if I had anything to do over, I would have made it much more comfortable. Nice padded arms, I have spools, wooden spools for arms, I would have done something about that, since it’s my one little stage, that chair.
 
BD, you were on LAW AND ORDER for 11 years. Did you jump or were you wooed from that to do this?
BD: No, my time was not up. I was kind of just looking around and I decided at the time when new shows were starting to be cast, I decided to just kind of throw my hat in the ring again and see if anything would turn up. And I was lucky that this came along, and so I just basically kind of quietly transitioned from one to the other. They never even really explained what happened to Dr. Huang on [LAW AND ORDER] and I suppose that left the door open for some kind of reappearance or something, but it was very quiet and uneventful, and so no, I was kind of by my own doing kind of lured from one to the other, really.
 
Do you think your reality in AWAKE is the real one or the imagined one, and why?
BD: Well, obviously mine is the real reality. There can be no other, and there’s no even questioning it as far as I’m concerned. In fact I’m not even sure who it is that we’re talking to right now.
CHERRY: Of course, I’m sort of amazed that Detective Britten’s psyche would come up with a therapist like Dr. Lee, but we’re going to be working on that.  [Laughter]
BD: Really, to be honest, there is no other way to play any of the scenes than that you are the one that is real and that the other person is the one that’s imagined. If you start thinking about it too much, you’ll go crazy, literally.
CHERRY: I mean it’s ludicrous, I mean of course we’re the real ones. And that’s as real as we know we are, that’s the dilemma for Detective Britten. Each world is as real as we know we are.  I mean it’s like a hall of mirrors.
BD: Yes, I think that he that, as far as it being also a television show, one must always be open to any possibility. I mean the show can be.  Who knows what the writers have in store for what really is real and what is not.  And there are times when I’m not clear about it at all, and I like it that way.
CHERRY: What I love about it is — I mean when you think about our own dreams and how we can create, flesh out living, breathing people that we know intimately or that we’ve never met before, and yet our brains are capable of these incredible scenarios. And even when we dream about famous people that we know, our brains are writing all the dialogue. I mean, we’re brilliant in our dreams. And what makes this one unique is that he has ordered this other dream in such a completely realistic way that of course you can’t tell what’s real and what’s not.
 
Jason said that his relationships with both of you shifts as the season moves along and the end of the pilot he basically kind of rejects both of you from helping him. So can you share a little bit about how you approach being his psychologist. Do either of you come at him aggressively, and how does that relationship kind of evolve in both of your offices?
BD: I think he’s probably most resistant to me and that’s partly because I’m the one that’s more aggressive and challenging and a little bit less pleasant, to be quite honest. And also who wouldn’t be more irritated by me than by Cherry Jones? What’s funny to me is that he really is, from my perception, Britten is resistant the entire time from the whole idea of treatment or even dealing with any of this, as well as he should be to support the premise of the show. And so that’s just an evolution that continues throughout the season until there’s finally a kind of breaking point. But I find him very resistant the entire time, don’t you, Cherry?
CHERRY: Yes, because he just can’t, you know, it means giving up one of his loved ones, so of course he’s going to resist. Dr. Evans’ approach is, it is much softer and she understands that he is in tremendous pain.  And rather than trying to confront him with the absurdity of what he believes to be true, my character really does want to try to create a very safe environment, so that he can feel free to tell me everything and through this we can maybe create a blueprint for him to move back to one world.
BD: It really does make you realize how it’s very rare that you have a character that has two therapists. I mean, none of us has two therapists, not that I know of anyway.  So it’s very rare that you can make a comparison between two different doctor’s techniques. And it makes you realize how crucial that relationship you have with your therapist is. I mean there are all these other therapists out there, is there a one that would be better for me than the one that I’ve got? And that kind of thing. I just think that’s really interesting. Their techniques are so different, and he seems to be equally uncomfortable or comfortable with either of them. I don’t think he’s more or less comfortable with one of us than the other. But he is uncomfortable with the whole idea of being treated, and yet he knows that something’s really not right with himself, and so he continues to stick it out. But I just find it really fascinating that you get to see how two people deal with the same problem. Two different doctors are dealing with the same situation, because it’s quite different.
 
Jason said that he was told which world was real and which wasn’t. Are you saying that you don’t know, or you do know?
CHERRY: Had you heard that BD?
BD: That he said that? No, I did not. I wouldn’t be so surprised that he would say that. But, I don’t know.  You may be able to tell from our reaction that we were not [in the know]. . .  I won’t speak for Cherry, but I prefer it that way. I don’t really want to know.
 
It works better for you as an actor, right?
BD: Yes, absolutely, and I think the longer that we suspend that mystery and suspense about one being real and the other not being real, the better it is for the show in some ways.
CHERRY: I am intrigued by that statement. No, well, not yours, but that Jason knows. I am stunned. And now when we see him again we can just throw him down on the floor and tickle him until he tells.
BD: Which would be fun in any case anyway.  [Laughter]
CHERRY: Yes, but you’re right, we must not know until the fat lady sings with this one.
BD: That’s what it feels like to me. I’m shocked. But I mean it is kind of a Jason-y thing to say, don’t you think?
CHERRY: So you don’t think it’s true?
BD: I’m not saying that he would lie about that. Because I think that he probably has some kind of perception of the resolution of the show, possibly, maybe as the co-producer of the show and as the leading man of the show, he does have a better understanding than we do of what’s to come. But I’m just guessing that, because you know when I spend the day-to-day with him, I feel like he really doesn’t know.
CHERRY: I forget the co-producer part, that he has more responsibilities than just acting Detective Britten.
BD: Yes, and he also plays a role as the person who’s the centerpiece of the whole show, as the leading man of the show. And I suppose he could if he wanted to demand to know what their thoughts and plans were. I don’t think I personally would if I was him, but maybe he’s done that.
CHERRY: Maybe the writers in both worlds have told him which one is real.
BD: That’s right.
CHERRY: Maybe he’s splitting off into many different characters and maybe — I don’t know what I’m trying to say. I’ll just stop right there. [Laughter]
 
It almost seems as though there are two casts on the show, the red and the green. Do you guys get to see each other on set, like to compare notes or sit down and work out ways to exacerbate the differences between the therapists?
BD: We don’t really act with each other, but we do pass each other in the night as it were. Our sets are next to each other.  Cherry’s office set and my office set are right adjacent to one another. So invariably they shoot our scenes on the same day and one of us will be first and the other one will follow, and they’ll call us in a kind of overlapping way. So we definitely see each other and we see each other as we’re preparing in makeup and all of that stuff. But we also like — I’ve taken to kind of leaving notes for Cherry on the set and stuff like that, that she might find randomly.
CHERRY: Little Easter eggs, yes.
BD: Easter eggs.
CHERRY: Dr. Lee was here.
BD: There is a kind of — well I don’t know there’s the Rex and Hannah thing, and I never get to act with Dylan, who plays Rex, but I may be there on the same day as Laura as it turns out. I’ve run into everyone.  But for the most part, my scenes are all with Jason, and I only really work with Jason and then everyone else I run into is just based on whether they’ve been called a little earlier or later than I am and I’ve just run into them in the makeup room or the trailers or at the food table or something like that.
CHERRY: And I’ll tell you what Allison, we all kind of fall on each other when we see each other, because it’s a really, really sweet group of people.
BD: It is.
CHERRY: Everyone gets along and supports each other, and when we do run into Wilmer or Steve or Dylan or we all are just so happy to see each other and do a quick catch-up on how their world is going.
BD: Yes, I do really like everyone, it’s a really nice group of people. One of the nicer groups.
CHERRY: Yes, it’s one of those groups, and the crew is so great. You’d love to see it go on and on, just because it’s not that they’re rare, those kind of families making a show, but it has, I think this one must be particularly pleasant.
BD: I mean, they often say that there’s always one kind of icky person, and we don’t have that. I don’t think we have it even on the crew, which is kind of amazing to me.
 
Although your characters have really different approaches to the therapy, are they on a parallel journey with each other to the same place with Britten, or different? How do you both see it?
BD: I would imagine, I think that we are on a parallel journey, don’t you think?
CHERRY: Yes, yes, towards one world in health.
BD: And I think that parallel journey has to do with the fact that the arc of the season is following the central character, Britten, and so his issues are bouncing our work with him is bouncing off of what he’s experiencing. So he’ll come in one day and say, “This happened.” And then either of us will say, “Oh, well tell me about, I’ll tell you what I think that means that this happened.” And so we each have a different take on that one central theme of the episode or something like that. And so I do think that that forces us to be kind of running alongside one another, where nobody’s every way off in a different place, because we’re linked by this character.
 
Can you both tell us how your characters were different when you first read this script, and how they changed to fit you as the actors?  What you’ve brought to the particular role?
CHERRY: Well, I know that because mine was originally written as a very inexperienced, very enthusiastic young psychiatrist, obviously, and I don’t know if she was almost written originally as some kind of comic relief. Because she was sort of almost gee whiz about everything — everything was “fantastic” and “wow.”
BD: She nodded a lot.
CHERRY: She nodded a lot and was just sort of blown away by every revelation. And obviously when they hired a more mature actress, they had to, through the first two or three episodes, they’re still trying to figure out who she is, and I think they still wanted to keep this, this very extreme contrast between the two psychiatrists. So, and I think maybe the second episode, they have my character be very I’m talking about Greek mythology and aboriginal dreams and you know I’m doing all this sort of almost more academic stuff, but with a great deal of enthusiasm. And then they sort of settled her down into more of a Mother Earth kind of character as it goes along. So I was just along for the ride for the first two or three episodes till they started to hear her voice. So that’s my journey in the first few episodes.
BD: I think that my journey has maintained a certain kind of thread of consistency.  Although I did discover at the end of the season a kind of a — I don’t want to give away what happens so I’m going try to be careful about what I say — but I did realize how much I cared about him at the end of the season, because in the beginning of the season I found that I was very challenging to him and kind of giving him a lot of ultimatums and tough love, in a very clinical kind of way. And I think somehow either just naturally or partly naturally, partly written into the arc of the character, was the sense that he was not only very invested in the outcome of the health, of mental health of Britten’s character, but that he actually was invested enough to care, to have emotions that had to do with either his happiness at his success or the sadness of his failure.
 
Do you think they have different motivations, because at times it seems they’re not.  Like  Cherry’s character is concerned with the dreams helping him see other things where Lee is more like, “You have to stop these dreams because they’re hurting you.” Do you think that they both are after something different, or do you think its just part of the approach?
BD: Ultimately I think they really want him to admit that he’s dreaming. And how they go about that, or how they view it may be very different. I’m all about, “You are dreaming” and “Fess up that you’re dreaming,” almost. And Cherry I think finds, well I’ll let her speak for herself, it seems to me she finds it useful that the dream is actually happening and as a tool, it’s part of a tool.
CHERRY: Yes, I mean I think that’s a very interesting question because, yes, we both want him to come back to living in one world. But I think Dr. Evans’ approach may bring him back to one world with a greater understanding of that one world. Because she is delving into “why.” I mean and I know your character is too, BD.  “Why are you dreaming this? And what does that tell you about the here-and-now in this world?” But I if they can get him back in the same world and he’s learned something about his real world from those dreams, that’s, yes, that’s what we’re looking for.
BD: Except that you and I will no longer have a job.
CHERRY: This is true.
 
Are the characters going to start delving more into kind of about the accident somewhat? So we can learn more about that?
BD: Yes.
 
Did you do any research kind of on psychology before the role, I mean BD you may have before, but did you need any of that?
BD: I didn’t.  I mean I didn’t even do it very much before, although Neal Baer, who was the showrunner on LAW AND ORDER, is a doctor himself and that’s partly why my character was added to that cast was because the medical perspective was brought in by the showrunner. And so all the research that I was able to do on that show came from Neal and his understanding of and his knowledge and all of that. I didn’t really do much on my own, except for years of my own therapy.
CHERRY: I guess I haven’t done much research either. I guess because whatever the writers have us say sort of becomes our instruction manual as psychologists. I almost don’t want to delve too much into other techniques since the only techniques I’m going to be given are from the writers, so that becomes my bible for Evans’ approach. I don’t want to start knowing so much about it that I go to the writers and say, “Well, Jung said…”
BD: I don’t either.  And I also just like to be — I mean that’s the strange thing about being in a television show as opposed to being in a play or a movie — you have to be as open as possible to any number of things that are going to turn or twist in a way that if you had made a decision about something, or know something very specific, it could be wrong, actually.
CHERRY: Yes. You chisel out your character as you get the scripts in a way, too.
 
David Slade directed the pilot.  So what was it like working with him and some of the other directors?
BD: We had some great directors. I like almost every single one, I don’t recall not liking any of them, which is kind of rare for me, I hate to say. He was great.  He was very helpful.  Actually he was my best memory of David Slade is that he was very helpful for me during the audition process because he was the director for the pilot and involved in the process of coaching me before my final test, and that was extremely helpful. And he gave great notes.  He has a great cinematic eye and I think one of the reasons the pilot looks so great is because there’s a lot of interesting camera moves and interesting lighting choices. In the pilot — kind of sad to me that we didn’t ever go back to this — but there was this dreamy kind of thing that he did.  If you’ll notice in the pilot, that it’s as if the clouds are covering the sun while we’re talking in the office. Did he do this in your room, Cherry?
CHERRY: Maybe.
BD: He dimmed the lights down and brought them back up at very weird times during the scenes, as if the sun was peeking behind the clouds and it was really interesting, and when you see some of these scenes in the show, I don’t think you really will notice it unless you’re looking for it. It’s quite beautiful and very cinematic.
 CHERRY: Yes, so much more about making television and film, — and if that happens in my office I wasn’t aware of it — what a neat way to bring in nature that way.  To illuminate and darken the scene, that’s really interesting. I enjoyed him immensely too. I mean he’s a very eccentric man.
BD: Very quirky.
CHERRY: Very quirky, and I believe he told me that he was incredibly shy as a young boy and he’s a bit of a performer now. He’s gone the other way, and he’s really delightful. And you just never know what he’s going to do or say next. And coming from the theater where you have if you’re lucky and you’re in a successful production, you have one director, and that’s the only director you’re going to see for months – and, or in my case with “Doubt, “was the only director I saw, I had worked with in a couple of years, and yet I was on stage every night of those couple of years. And with this every week to have a completely different personality come in and take the helm, it is fascinating, because you go into the makeup trailer each day of the newest episode and you start polling everyone and say, “Well, what do you think?” and “What is their approach?” and  the answers are always completely different. But they have been terrific, all of them.
BD: They have. I was really very pleased with all of them. I enjoyed it.
CHERRY: And there’s some that work incredibly quickly, and then others that take their time. But they were, for the most part they were always, they were all very, very gentle with us.
BD: Yes, and mindful.  Many of them had done a lot of research on the show and watched all the episodes. You would think that they would have, but they were very articulate about the show, which gives you a real nice sense of trust when you’re working with someone new like that, that they really know what they’re talking about.
CHERRY: And then they always Jason will often have conversations with directors about things in the script because now he’s been living this part since August, and he knows it better than anyone.  So it’s always fascinating to hear his conversations with the directors about a moment.  And there are times when Jason with the permission of the writers and the director, when we’re about to shoot something, he’ll change again — with the consent of the writers — he’ll change a line because he realizes that it’s going to make more sense in whatever world it applies to. He just knows it backwards and forwards now.
BD: Yes, and so that’s built in to the relationship that any director comes into this particular show with. That dynamic with Jason.
CHERRY: Because it is complicated.
BD: It is.
CHERRY: I can’t imagine what it’s like to play two different realities at once. And such dynamic worlds.
BD: Yes, every one in some ways turns to Jason as the fulcrum to what is really Jason will often say things like, “Well I can’t say this, because on the other side I said this, and this relates to this and this is why I’m saying this.” He’s the only person that knows in some way. And that’s really interesting to see revealed. He is extreme.  Jason himself is really on top of the two realities and what each of them, how each of them functions in the episode. And so, we’re actually lucky that he takes such care and is so diligent about keeping track of them.
CHERRY: He also plays great music in between set-ups.
 
Is there a specific like scene or moment that you can talk about that you’re excited for the fans to see?
BD: There is, definitely. I’m not sure how to describe any of them without giving too much away. What do you think, Cherry? I would just say that there are rare occasions when, like I said earlier in the interview, when I was not sitting in the chair for one reason or another and I think those times are going to be really interesting for people, for the fans of the show. Without saying too much about that, I mean I found it interesting for me and I found I think it was a really interesting aspect to the show.
CHERRY: And I have to say that I think what I’m looking forward to the most, and this is not to be a tease, but the final moments of the final episode.
BD: Yes. Cherry and I were both there for some of those moments as they were shot and some of it was really exciting and really wonderful and beautiful, as well. It had that Awake kind of beautifully shot, beautifully lit and extremely evocative and thought-provoking and mysterious.
CHERRY: Shh, shh, shh, shh, shh, shh.
BD: Well, yes.  [Laughter]
 
To see the careful dance between patient and psychiatrist as Det. Britten tries to balance his  conflicting realities, be sure to tune in for the premiere of AWAKE on Thursday, March 1st at 10PM on NBC (Global in Canada).


Stars David Giuntoli and Sasha Roiz Talk All Things GRIMM

 
Stars David Giuntoli and Sasha Roiz Talk All Things GRIMM
Published on the TV addict | shared via feedly


 
In a season unique for embracing the darker world of fairytales, the supernatural series GRIMM has risen to an all new level as its stories delve deep into the where the creatures of the night are downright terrifying.  Taking a few minutes to chat with press in a recent conference call, stars David Giuntoli and Sasha Roiz pondered the increasingly complex relationship of Det. Nick Burkhart and Captain Renard – the Grimm and his mysterious protector.
 
Given where Captain Renard started in the pilot, how have you been able to adapt and identify with him?
SASHA: Well, the character’s been developed quite a bit since the beginning. We’ve had a lot more freedom now that I think we’ve established the story of GRIMM and the characters of GRIMM and the world that we’re living in. And so now there’s a little bit more freedom to get a little deeper. And as you saw last week and especially in this week’s episode, you’ll get a real sense of who the character is and sort of the direction in which he’s going. It’s been a lot of fun from script-to-script and just getting a little bit more insight into the pathology of GRIMM. So it’s definitely start to pick up the pace at this point.
 
Given where Nick is at this point in the season, have you gained a better understanding of who he is as a GRIMM through his own journey?
DAVID: This coming episode I’m going to be learning a lot about my past or Nick’s going to be learning a lot about his past, and it helps, I think, put some things to bed for him — some worries he’s always had, some things he’s always wanted to know. But he understands his role a little bit more now. He’s not as terrified by his new identity and he’s kind of using it as a tool, his Grimm-stincts as I like to call them and his powers, and he’s using them as a tool now and trying to make his role and use it.
 
This week’s episode looks like a really strong one for both of your characters. What can you tell us about it and your experience working with Titus Weller?
DAVID: First of all, Titus is a brilliant actor and it was wonderful having him with us. His character brings Nick some news about his family and his past. I don’t want to get too far into it. I don’t know how deep into it I can go. But, suffice it to say, I learned some big chunky pieces of info from Titus. And Sasha’s role, Captain Renard, goes through some pretty wild times.
SASHA: Titus was great to work with. He’s a great actor and it’s really fun to have him on set and the episode is a really strong one. You’re going to see that’s where we really sort of found our stride. A lot of the episodes now are starting to kind of be self-contained in a sense that a lot of the crimes or a lot of the sort of action and motivations keep feeding on mythology in our storylines; and they just kind of strengthen that whole side of our show, which is really exciting and with every show there’s more and more details unfolding. So this is a really good example of the direction we’re heading in.
 
The relationship between Nick and Monroe is a interesting one. In this last episode Nick really put himself in danger to save Monroe.  Can you talk about stepping in the ring with Monroe and filming that fight scene?
DAVID: Oh my goodness, that was one of the coldest nights we’ve had and we were up in the hills somewhere outside of Portland. And those are the scenes that kind of do themselves because we had these wonderful actors who are really into the show and I think excited to be there.  It’s kind of screaming and almost like frothy at the mouth. It was insane.  Generally when you put me into a octagon shaped cage, I’m going to perform well.  . .  It was really fun to do that. Monroe is a guy who Nick needed — first for utility and just to learn the ropes of the kind of the new world that Nick entered into. But obviously we’ve developed a relationship and a friendship and a bond. And I think that he used to kind of save my ass all of the time, and I dragged him into this kind of world a bit. So, yes, I would put my life on the line for him at this point.
 
What do we have to look forward to in these episodes coming up and the second half of the season?
SASHA: Well that’s a good question. What’s in the second half of the season? Like I mentioned earlier, we’ve been given a lot of freedom to explore the mythology and explore the back stories of the characters, as well as the interpersonal relationships. So it’s been tremendous fun for us as we get to know our characters a little bit better and as we get to know each other and each other’s characters a little better. So we’re not quite as burdened by certain strictly procedural storylines. We get the chance to play a little bit of the GRIMM-map so to speak.
DAVID: Sasha’s completely right. We’re more comfortable in our roles now. We’ve laid down the foundation for kind of defining what this GRIMM-world is. So now we kind of get to play within that. There’s going to be some upcoming episodes, particularly this “Three Coins in a Fuchsbau,” which is coming up on Friday that really drives the overarching storyline forward and answer some questions for my character and for the viewers, and we’re going to get a lot more of that as the season goes on.
 
What was it like the first time that you read for your respective roles? What were your first impressions of your characters?
DAVID: The first time I read for it, I had met and worked with the director before and also I had met two of the producers, Sean Hayes and Todd Millner before — I worked with them all that year  and Mark Buckland directed the pilot – so as opposed to a lot of kind of cold auditions, I kind of already felt they were rooting for me. I don’t know what exactly they were looking for but they were very helpful and kind of coaching me through the audition a bit and told me exactly what they want and spent time with me. But my first take on Nick was that he always thought he wanted to go home, instead of go like drinking with the guys. I wanted to watch like two movies with Juliette and was very happy settling down into a nice little life with some rose — which makes what happened to him in the pilot episode all the more horrifying and terrible — the fact that he’s seeing monsters his whole life.  What he thought he had is gone and he clings to that. He wants it to remain and it’s very difficult to maintain this little domestic life while ogres and bad guys are chasing him.DAVID:
SASHA: Initially I read for the Blutbad way back when, and then they called me back weeks later for Renard and it wasn’t very much on the page. So I really wasn’t sure what they were calling me for. And then after they picked me for the role, then they explained to me that it was where they were planning on going with it and then became a lot more interesting than what I saw in the script initially. But I think they were going in a very different direction originally with the role. They were going a lot older and a lot more African American than myself. So they just kind of like changed their casting decision I think and kind of went in a different direction with the character all together. Because I just remember when I was sitting waiting to audition I was like, “I think I seem to be in the wrong room because this is not generally the demographic I audition with.” But I’m glad that they did and I’m glad they chose me and it’s been a lot of fun. And they really held true to their promise. They developed this role into something quite interesting. . . .It was a very strange casting day that day for me. But I’m very glad I attended.
 
Did the creators have an actual hierarchy planted out or plotted out as to how who’s who in the Wesson-world and exactly where does Renard fit in there?
SASHA: Well, I think there was mention last week of “your highness”–  and as sort of sarcastic as the character Leo is being — there’s truth to that. So I mean that’s the direction we’re headed in. I mean he’s descendant of a royal line and he’s set his sights on reestablishing that royal order in Portland, at least for himself.
 
Could you talk a little bit about Nick’s relationship with Juliette, how that sort of developed.
DAVID: Well, I don’t know exactly where the writers are taking the relationship. My impulse — and I believe this to be true — is that they’re taking it down the road that I want her to marry me. I want her to be in the dark. I want her to be safe. I want everything at once. I don’t want her to know about my current situation. My aunt predicated this whole thing by saying I had to leave [Juliette] and she is in harm’s way. So I’m kind of always dancing that fine-line of telling her or not. I think that they want me to ask her to marry her and I think Nick wants to end up with her.  I don’t know what’s going to happen with us as this series goes on, but something’s got to happen soon something’s got to happen as far as I have to let her in or she has to leave me – or I’m going to kill her or something if it’s terrible. But I need to let her in somehow. Or I’m not going to kill her, but she’ll end up dying because I’m not going to kill her.
SASHA: That’s the only thing you’re going to read from this point on, Giuntoli, “I’m going to have to kill her.” Headline. The only thing that’s going to be quoted from this conversation!  [Laughter]
 
What were some perhaps initial challenges you found stepping into this role? And what have you enjoyed most about sort of playing both sides of the fences with the role?
SASHA: The hardest thing — and which continues to be – but it’s not a burden — it’s just the difficult thing when you’re playing the sort of mysterious character is that a lot of the mystery isn’t completely hatched. So you’re kind of waiting around sometimes to be informed of what your machinations are and what you’re actually motivated to be doing. So you don’t always know the grand picture until the writers provide you with it. So that’s sometimes a little difficult because you’re kind of sort of overreaching or trying to at least trying to determine for yourself what the best sort of path is as your character proceeds. But playing both sides of the fence, it’s great. I don’t see Renard as somebody who’s duplicitous. I don’t. Maybe some other people do. I see him very much as a character who believes in a certain order and believes in a very strict order with him at the top of that and really cares about the population of his canton or kingdom or whatever we’re defining it as. He wants peace and he wants civil obedience within it, and he’ll stop at nothing to achieve that. That’s not really uncharacteristic of a lot of nations or regimes or what have you. So I just think he’s just set out to accomplish that and that’s it really is only with the one focus with him.
 
Can you talk a little bit about where you would like to see your characters go for the rest of the season and through the end of next season?
DAVID: For my character — I think this has been actually happening especially in this later part of the season — Nick kind of goes from perpetually stunned observer and  passive observer and someone who’s in denial of his new role and slowly starts to really use these tools to his advantage. I would love to see my character — and again, I think it is going this way — turn into kind of an active hunter or profiler who doesn’t just read the books but adds to them. I think one of the great things about him is he’s not like other Grimms who would just slay anything that morphed in front of their eyes. And I don’t think he’s going to be that but I think he is going to develop his powers, become a real force and a more of a hunter. . . Moving from passive to active ultimately is the arc that has been taking place and it’s exciting to do that.
SASHA: Less “rose,” more action is what you’re saying.
DAVID: I want to keep the “rose.”
SASHA: I would like to get into the backstory, specifically the past what sort of formed this man. I think there’s a really interesting story brewing about where he comes from and the obstacles that he’s had to face. I think there’s a reason he’s as stern and as unyielding as he is, and I’d like to explore that. I think there’s probably some very interesting loss and pain and all sorts of stuff like that that sort of propelled him to where he is. So be fun to investigate it.
 
Is that possibly in the works?
SASHA: I think so because we’ve already touched upon some things in future episodes where there’s a certain family element. And there’s definitely a sense of other royals and competition and a certain pressure to get things accomplished because there’s definitely a time factor because they’re all sort of vying for positions of power.
 
Which GRIMM creature has been kind of your favorite on the show so far?
SASHA: Oh boy, the Blutbad.
DAVID: Monroe. You know, we mentioned it before, he’s fantastic. But as far as guest stars, I got to tell you I loved, back in “Three Bad Wolves,” I really like the character of Hap who was Monroe’s old love interest’s brother. He was created by Brad Hinkey. Anybody who can bring some kind of levity to a otherwise fairly serious show I think are kind of my favorites.
SASHA: As a character who will rarely if ever crack a joke, I appreciate anyone who brings a little humor and levity to our show. So definitely when we have some fun characters and actors who could provide that, we’re thrilled. And luckily we’ve got like stylists and Reggie providing a lot of comedy for us. They never cease to amaze me though. They’re like always end up bringing in some great lines and some great characters every time. But I also enjoy some of the dark mythological elements. Like I’m really enjoy the reapers and that whole storyline, and guys who wield scythes. I mean that’s pretty crazy. And we got a really interesting one in this episode, which I don’t want to give away, but it’s sort of like a hunter kind of character that comes to collect.  Anyway it’s just very interesting like the mythology is developing and some very intriguing characters are coming to the surface.
 
Why do you think that the show has taken off in the way that it has?
DAVID: Well, I think I think network-after-network, they have a lot of great TV shows. There are a lot of cop shows. There’s a lot of great stuff on TV. But I think we have and had this year is a very unique identity. And when you hear the concept of the show you’re like, “oh, that’s kind of weird and silly,” it sticks with you right away. So I think initially that was very good for us because it wasn’t like anything else. Even now there was ONCE UPON A TIME, clearly a very different show. This has a very different tone. And after that initial kind of hook, I think the writers have done a superb job to kind of slowly develop these characters, bring in some really gruesome storylines while keeping some comedy in there and keeping people interested. It’s great Friday night television and I think it’s a great escapism show, and what I think it’s great for families too – and that’s whose been watching it largely.
SASHA:  I think we’ve been brilliantly surprised.  So happily surprised that the demographic was so much wider than we even anticipated. Like David mentioned, there’s families watching, which sometimes surprises me considering how gruesome it is. I mean it’s sort of really horrifying and I’m amazed at how many parents watch it with their kids. But, hey I think it’s great. I love the fact that we entertain families as well as individuals and I think it’s a fantastic Friday night end-of-the-week sort of show that just sort of take off your shoes and relax and just kind of turn off and escape with us. And it’s worked out beautifully. And I’m really grateful that there’s other shows like ONCE UPON A TIME. When we were first coming out everyone kept pitting us against one another. I think what they failed to understand is we actually support one another. I think we add to the whole spectrum of television and, in doing so, we just kind of add a lot of momentum to one another. I’m glad to see more shows like that. I’m happy we’re able to do that for one another.
DAVID: I agree with that. It was always great — the fact that both of us came on the air at the same time, it was a story for people to write about — and the more visibility the better.
 
Is there anything that you’ve been surprised to learn about your characters and yourselves as we delve deeper into the world of GRIMM?
SASHA: Anything I’m surprised about as we delve deeper? You know, I’m always surprised because honestly sometimes with every episode there’s a new development in my storyline, my mythology that I often don’t see coming. On one hand it’s very disconcerting because as an actor you just want to get it all right and you just want to get it all for an honest performance and you want to be able to sort of plan ahead. But it’s sort of the nature of episodic television. You don’t know sometimes what’s coming. And it’s been challenging and a lot of fun to just sort of being thrown off a little bit by the developments. So there’s some very interesting stuff coming down and, as I hear the rumblings from the writer’s room like all these ideas of where they want to take things, it never fails to amaze me and surprise me. So hopefully it will translate as well in the performances and the scripts.
DAVID: I second what Sasha was saying there. In episodic TV you have to keep things secret to keep the viewer in suspense. So we as actors are often in suspense as well. We don’t necessarily know what is going on, we have some back story — and I had a lot easier time with my back story than Sasha because his character’s so mysterious — but you probably learn a lot more about your character episode than I learn about mine. But in this coming episode on Friday, “Three Coins in Fuchsbau,” when I first read the script, I was very surprised because my character Nick gets some major chunks of information kind of thrown at him and that he’s been seeking for a very, very long time about his family. So you never know when this is going to come up and it happened to come up in this Episode 13. So it was very exciting to read that on the page and to get to perform it.
SASHA: I think you’re going to get a sense  that this episode really sort of brings it all together in a way. Like this is a very exciting episode and I think everything we’ve been sort of building on this season really starts to gel and even congeal rather in this episode. Like you get a sense of our show I think as clearly as has ever been presented.
DAVID: I agree.
 
To see the big reveal as to Captain Renard and just how quickly Nick starts to develop his Grimm-powers, be sure to catch GRIMM as it airs Friday nights at 9PM on NBC (CTV in Canada)